Bibliothèque Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Accueil
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Michael L. Raposa |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
trié(s) par Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
In the Presence of the Universe / Michael L. Raposa in Harvard Theological Review, 103/2 (2010)
[article]
Titre : In the Presence of the Universe : Peirce, Royce, and Theology as Theosemiotic Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Michael L. Raposa, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : pp. 237-247. Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : I continue to be preoccupied with the task of delineating the features of a distinctive tradition in American religious thought that I refer to as theosemiotic. It can be traced back through Ralph Waldo Emerson to Jonathan Edwards as an early exemplar. It achieves full flower in the philosophy of Charles S. Peirce and then bears fruit in the work of the later Josiah Royce and in some of H. Richard Niebuhr's writings. This essay focuses on Peirce and on the later Royce. Peirce's theosemiotic is most clearly discernible in his 1908 article “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God,” especially when one reads that article in the context of Peirce's developed theory of signs. I do not intend to engage here in any sort of detailed exegesis of the Neglected Argument. Instead, I wish to focus on the continuity between Peirce and Royce visible in the latter's book on The Problem of Christianity, with most of my attention being directed to the discussion in the second part of that work.
in Harvard Theological Review > 103/2 (2010) . - pp. 237-247.[article] In the Presence of the Universe : Peirce, Royce, and Theology as Theosemiotic [texte imprimé] / Michael L. Raposa, Auteur . - 2010 . - pp. 237-247.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Harvard Theological Review > 103/2 (2010) . - pp. 237-247.
Résumé : I continue to be preoccupied with the task of delineating the features of a distinctive tradition in American religious thought that I refer to as theosemiotic. It can be traced back through Ralph Waldo Emerson to Jonathan Edwards as an early exemplar. It achieves full flower in the philosophy of Charles S. Peirce and then bears fruit in the work of the later Josiah Royce and in some of H. Richard Niebuhr's writings. This essay focuses on Peirce and on the later Royce. Peirce's theosemiotic is most clearly discernible in his 1908 article “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God,” especially when one reads that article in the context of Peirce's developed theory of signs. I do not intend to engage here in any sort of detailed exegesis of the Neglected Argument. Instead, I wish to focus on the continuity between Peirce and Royce visible in the latter's book on The Problem of Christianity, with most of my attention being directed to the discussion in the second part of that work.