Bibliothèque Université Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Accueil
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Richard Cross |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
trié(s) par Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Aquinas on Physical Impairment: Human Nature and Original Sin / Richard Cross in Harvard Theological Review, 110/3 (2017)
[article]
Titre : Aquinas on Physical Impairment: Human Nature and Original Sin Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Richard Cross, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : 317-338 Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Harvard Theological Review > 110/3 (2017) . - 317-338[article] Aquinas on Physical Impairment: Human Nature and Original Sin [texte imprimé] / Richard Cross, Auteur . - 2017 . - 317-338.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Harvard Theological Review > 110/3 (2017) . - 317-338Quid tres? On What Precisely Augustine Professes Not to Understand in De Trinitate 5 and 7 / Richard Cross in Harvard Theological Review, 100/2 (April 2007)
[article]
Titre : Quid tres? On What Precisely Augustine Professes Not to Understand in De Trinitate 5 and 7 Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Richard Cross, Auteur Année de publication : 2008 Article en page(s) : pp. 215-232. Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : It is generally held by systematic theologians that Augustine more or less radically shifts the understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity found in his Greek sources, and that, at least in part, this shift is a consequence of his failure fully to understand these sources. His own testimony of puzzlement provides some strong prima facie evidence in favor of such readings.
in Harvard Theological Review > 100/2 (April 2007) . - pp. 215-232.[article] Quid tres? On What Precisely Augustine Professes Not to Understand in De Trinitate 5 and 7 [texte imprimé] / Richard Cross, Auteur . - 2008 . - pp. 215-232.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Harvard Theological Review > 100/2 (April 2007) . - pp. 215-232.
Résumé : It is generally held by systematic theologians that Augustine more or less radically shifts the understanding of the doctrine of the Trinity found in his Greek sources, and that, at least in part, this shift is a consequence of his failure fully to understand these sources. His own testimony of puzzlement provides some strong prima facie evidence in favor of such readings.