Bibliothèque Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Auteur GREGORY Andrew
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke—Acts / GREGORY Andrew in Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Volume 29.4 (june 2007)
[article]
Titre : The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke—Acts Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : GREGORY Andrew, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : pp. 459-472. Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : This article argues that Irenaeus and the author of the Muratorian Fragment each read Luke and Acts as two elements of one literary whole, but that Irenaeus's understanding of what this literary unity entails appears to have been different from that of many modern scholarly readings of Luke—Acts. It also argues that there is reason to believe that Luke intended his two volumes to circulate together, and offers hermeneutical reflections on the fact that they have not always been read in this way. Two different approaches to the reception of Luke and Acts are identified and the merits of each are discussed.
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 459-472.[article] The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke—Acts [texte imprimé] / GREGORY Andrew, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 459-472.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal for the Study of the New Testament > Volume 29.4 (june 2007) . - pp. 459-472.
Résumé : This article argues that Irenaeus and the author of the Muratorian Fragment each read Luke and Acts as two elements of one literary whole, but that Irenaeus's understanding of what this literary unity entails appears to have been different from that of many modern scholarly readings of Luke—Acts. It also argues that there is reason to believe that Luke intended his two volumes to circulate together, and offers hermeneutical reflections on the fact that they have not always been read in this way. Two different approaches to the reception of Luke and Acts are identified and the merits of each are discussed.