Bibliothèque Don Bosco de Lubumbashi
Auteur Schipper Jeremy
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
`Exile Atones for Everything' / Schipper Jeremy in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 31/4 (june 2007)
[article]
Titre : `Exile Atones for Everything' : Coping with Jeremiah 22.24-30 Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Schipper Jeremy, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : pp. 481-492. Langues : Anglais (eng) Tags : Jehoiachin Haggai Jeremiah Midrash Talmud Exile Résumé : The oracles concerning Jehoiachin in Jer. 22.24-30 seem both severe and absolute. This article examines how both early rabbinic and contemporary scholars cope with its unrelenting condemnation of Jehoiachin. Early rabbinic exegesis focuses on the idea that this passage contains an oath, whereas many contemporary scholars focus on the idea that at least part of this passage contains a lament. Yet these distinctions do not reflect objective classifications of the passage's literary type. Rather, they become a means of opening up the exegete's interpretative imagination. By reviewing some representative examples from early rabbinic and contemporary exegesis, this article argues that, in both cases, interpreters end up presenting a characterization of a god who does not give an unwavering endorsement of Jeremiah's harsh announcement.
Key Words: Jehoiachin • Haggai • Jeremiah • Midrash • Talmud • Exile
in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 31/4 (june 2007) . - pp. 481-492.[article] `Exile Atones for Everything' : Coping with Jeremiah 22.24-30 [texte imprimé] / Schipper Jeremy, Auteur . - 2007 . - pp. 481-492.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal for the Study of the Old Testament > 31/4 (june 2007) . - pp. 481-492.
Tags : Jehoiachin Haggai Jeremiah Midrash Talmud Exile Résumé : The oracles concerning Jehoiachin in Jer. 22.24-30 seem both severe and absolute. This article examines how both early rabbinic and contemporary scholars cope with its unrelenting condemnation of Jehoiachin. Early rabbinic exegesis focuses on the idea that this passage contains an oath, whereas many contemporary scholars focus on the idea that at least part of this passage contains a lament. Yet these distinctions do not reflect objective classifications of the passage's literary type. Rather, they become a means of opening up the exegete's interpretative imagination. By reviewing some representative examples from early rabbinic and contemporary exegesis, this article argues that, in both cases, interpreters end up presenting a characterization of a god who does not give an unwavering endorsement of Jeremiah's harsh announcement.
Key Words: Jehoiachin • Haggai • Jeremiah • Midrash • Talmud • Exile